Mediation In
Luojiang, Fujian

State Laws

Fujian Province follows the national People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China, adopted on 28 August 2010 and effective from 1 January 2011. As a unitary state, China does not have provincial mediation statutes; the national law applies uniformly across all provinces including Fujian. The law establishes the legal framework for people's mediation committees, mediator qualifications, mediation procedures, and the enforcement of mediation agreements. Provincial implementation is guided by the Fujian Provincial Department of Justice, which oversees the establishment and operation of people's mediation committees at village, residential, and enterprise levels throughout Fujian. Fujian's coastal location and cross-strait relations with Taiwan may influence certain mediation practices.

Licensing Requirements

People's mediators in Fujian are not required to hold professional licences in the same manner as lawyers. Under the national People's Mediation Law, people's mediators are selected by people's mediation committees based on their moral character, professional knowledge, and mediation skills. The Ministry of Justice provides guidelines for mediator training and certification, but formal licensing is not required. Mediators are often respected community members, village elders, retired officials, or professionals with relevant expertise. Judicial mediators are judges who have completed judicial training and passed the national judicial examination. Commercial mediators at specialised mediation centres may have professional backgrounds in law, business, or specific industries, but there is no mandatory national licensing scheme for commercial mediators. Fujian's cross-strait commercial activities may create demand for mediators with knowledge of Taiwan law and business practices.

Local Court Systems

Fujian Province has a four-tier court system consistent with China's national court hierarchy: basic people's courts at district or county level, intermediate people's courts at prefecture level, the Fujian Provincial Higher People's Court, and the Supreme People's Court at national level. Mediation is integrated at each level, with judicial mediation conducted by judges before trial. Basic people's courts handle most civil and commercial cases with judicial mediation, whilst intermediate people's courts handle appeals and more complex cases. The Fujian Provincial Higher People's Court oversees judicial administration and provides guidance on mediation practices within the province. Courts are staffed by judges who have passed the national judicial examination and completed judicial training. Fujian courts may have specialised expertise in cross-strait commercial disputes.

Legal Framework

China's mediation framework is anchored by the People's Mediation Law, which establishes the legitimacy and voluntary nature of people's mediation, clarifies mediation procedures, and affirms that mediation agreements are legally binding. The Civil Procedure Law provides for mediation by people's courts, establishing mediation as a fundamental principle of civil litigation. The Supreme People's Court has issued provisions on civil mediation by people's courts and judicial confirmation procedures for people's mediation agreements. China signed the Singapore Convention on Mediation in 2019, which provides that certain international commercial settlement agreements may be directly enforceable in member countries. The 2024 Legislative Work Plan lists the Regulations on Commercial Mediation as a key legislative project. The Zhuhai Municipal People's Congress adopted the Commercial Mediation Regulation of the Guangdong-Macao In-Depth Cooperation Zone in Hengqin, effective January 1, 2025.

While China operates under this legal framework, The Olive Branch's remote mediators bypass local court backlogs by providing swift, confidential, and mutually agreed-upon resolutions online.

Court System

Courts actively promote and facilitate mediation through various mechanisms. Judicial mediation is performed by judges, usually prior to trial, and in many cases a judge must first try to mediate a case. The Supreme People's Court launched a national online dispute resolution platform (www.fayuan.com) in 2017, with over 1,000 courts and 12,000 mediation organisations joining within one year. Courts can refer cases to mediation organisations and confirm mediation agreements through judicial confirmation, granting them the same legal force and enforceability as court judgments. The judiciary has experienced unprecedented growth in caseloads (67% increase from 2019 to 2024, from 28.7 million to 48 million cases), creating pressure to promote mediation as a way to resolve disputes efficiently.

Mediator Regulations

China has approximately 4 million people's mediators, far more than the number of judges or lawyers. However, almost none have received professional training historically. People's Mediation Committees are usually underfunded, with most mediators either poorly paid or entirely voluntary, and almost all are part-time. Recent reforms focus on professionalization, with more resources being used to train and educate mediators. Professional mediation organisations have emerged in insurance, securities, intellectual property, and other sectors, and China has begun to see its first full-time mediators. New regulations on commercial mediation establish standards for mediators and mediation organisations, requiring mediators to possess professional qualifications. The Central Chinese Government is pushing for greater professionalization and institutionalization of mediation.

Cultural Approach

Mediation in China has deep cultural roots in Confucian ethics, where mediators traditionally persuaded parties to reflect on their mistakes, give up their interests, and compromise to settle disputes. Making the dispute disappear for the betterment of the group was more important than individual desires and rights. As China pushes toward Rule of Law and provides more rights to citizens, modern mediation is evolving to focus more on party rights than overall group harmony. The cultural emphasis on harmony and face-saving remains strong. Chinese mediation style is typically more interventionist, with mediators actively guiding parties toward settlement. The vast network of People's Mediation Committees at the grassroots level reflects the cultural preference for community-based dispute resolution.

Typical Costs

People's mediation conducted through People's Mediation Committees is typically low-cost or free, as mediators are often volunteers or poorly paid. Court-annexed judicial mediation is generally included in court proceedings. Commercial mediation centres charge fees based on dispute value and complexity. The WIPO Centre offers reduced administration and mediator fees for cases referred by courts in China. Professional mediation organisations in sectors like insurance, securities, and intellectual property have their own fee structures. The cost savings compared to litigation are significant, with mediation typically resolving disputes in weeks rather than months. The judicial confirmation mechanism for mediation agreements provides enforceability without additional court proceedings.